Another Word for Remarkable on a Resume (And When to Cut It)

On a resume, the best replacement for remarkable is usually the evidence behind it — a number, a rank, or a named outcome. If you need an adjective, notable and significant claim less and survive scrutiny better than exceptional or outstanding.
Written by Naveed Akhtar, an SEO content writer with 10 years of article-writing experience. Published 2026-08-28. About 7 minutes.
Table of Contents
ToggleWhy Remarkable Weakens a Resume Line
Oxford Learner's Dictionaries traces remarkable to the French remarquer, "take note of." The word describes a reaction in the person reading, not a property of the thing itself.
That is the whole problem on a resume. Merriam-Webster's synonym note says remarkable "applies to something so extraordinary or exceptional as to invite comment."
Write it about your own work and you are reporting a recruiter's reaction back to them, before they have read anything that would produce it.
A hiring manager scanning forty applications does not accept that report. They skip the adjective and look for the thing underneath it.
The same trap catches the phrase "I'm humbled", which fails for the identical reason: it announces a reaction without naming anything that caused it.
What the Dictionaries Actually Say About These Four Words
The four candidates people reach for are not interchangeable, and the difference is not politeness or strength. It is what kind of claim each one makes.
| Word | Definition, as published | The claim it makes |
|---|---|---|
| Notable | "worthy of note : remarkable" (Merriam-Webster) | This deserves attention |
| Remarkable | "worthy of being or likely to be noticed especially as being uncommon or extraordinary" (Merriam-Webster) | This deserves comment |
| Outstanding | "marked by eminence and distinction" (Merriam-Webster); "extremely good; excellent" (Oxford Learner's) | This ranks above the group |
| Exceptional | "better than average : superior" (Merriam-Webster); "unusually good" (Oxford Learner's) | This ranks above the average |
Merriam-Webster groups remarkable with conspicuous, noticeable, prominent and striking, under words meaning "attracting notice or attention."
Exceptional sits somewhere else entirely. Its definition is comparative, which is a different kind of claim and a harder one to support.
So notable and remarkable are notice words. Outstanding and exceptional are rank words. A rank word without a stated comparison group is a claim with nothing under it.
Six Replacements, and What Each One Claims
| Alternative | Relationship to remarkable | Register | Best used when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notable | Exact synonym | Neutral | You want the same claim, more quietly |
| Significant | Near-synonym | Neutral, slightly formal | The result mattered, whether or not anyone noticed |
| Exceptional | Near-synonym | Formal | A comparison group appears in the same line |
| Outstanding | Near-synonym | Neutral | Nothing nearby can be misread as unpaid or unfinished |
| Measurable | Contextual alternative | Neutral | A number follows immediately |
| Proven | Contextual alternative | Neutral | You are describing a track record, not one result |
Measurable and proven are not synonyms. They are here because they solve the same problem by changing the sentence rather than the word.
Pretending otherwise would be the exact error this page exists to prevent. See three near-synonyms coming apart under the same test for a longer worked example.
Which Ones Drop Straight In
Take one ordinary resume line: "Remarkable improvement in customer retention." Here is what happens to it under each replacement.
| Alternative | Substitution | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Notable | Direct swap | Works unchanged. Slightly weaker, and more credible for it |
| Significant | Direct swap | Works unchanged. Shifts the claim from noticed to mattered |
| Exceptional | Swap with adjustment | Needs a comparison in the line — "exceptional against a regional average of 4%" |
| Outstanding | Swap with adjustment | Grammatically fine, but see the warning below before using it here |
| Measurable | Direct swap, meaning changes | Now claims the result was quantified, not that it was large. Only honest if the number follows |
| Proven | Requires rewrite | Attaches to a record, not a result: "Proven record of improving customer retention" |
For a resume bullet with a number available, use no adjective at all. The number does the work the adjective was reaching for.
Avoid exceptional when nothing in the line says what it is exceptional against, because the reader cannot test the claim and will discount it.
The Rewrite That Beats Every Synonym
The middle column is what most resume advice offers. The right column is what a recruiter actually reads, and the difference is not subtle.
| Original line | Best synonym swap | Adjective cut, evidence in |
|---|---|---|
| Remarkable improvement in customer retention | Notable improvement in customer retention | Raised customer retention from 71% to 88% in two quarters |
| A remarkable track record in B2B sales | A proven track record in B2B sales | Closed $2.4M in new B2B revenue across 11 accounts |
| Remarkable team leadership | Effective team leadership | Led a team of nine; cut onboarding from six weeks to three |
| Remarkable attention to detail | No swap rescues this line | Reduced production errors 40% by rebuilding the QA checklist |
| Remarkable growth in the region | Significant growth in the region | Grew regional accounts threefold in 18 months |
Row four is the useful one. Some adjectives cannot be repaired by replacement, because the sentence never contained a fact — only a self-assessment.
Whole phrases fail the same way. "Played a key role" is one of the most-deleted phrases in résumé editing, and for the same reason: it names a contribution without sizing it.
Watch Out: Outstanding Has a Second Life
Outstanding is the most common replacement people reach for, and it is the one alternative here that carries a second meaning working against you.
Merriam-Webster lists "unpaid" and "continuing to exist : unresolved" among its senses, well before the sense that means excellent.
Oxford Learner's illustrates the word with "She has outstanding debts of over £500" and "A lot of work is still outstanding."
On a finance, operations or project-management resume, that is your own vocabulary working against you, and you will not be there to explain.
"Outstanding invoice management" reads as praise or as a backlog. The recruiter picks one in about half a second, and never tells you which.
Do not substitute: avoid outstanding as praise directly before any noun that can itself be owed, pending or unresolved.
Invoices · balances · payments · debts · deliverables · work · issues · items · tickets · shares. Move the praise elsewhere, or pick another word.
Why the Thesaurus Sends You Somewhere Strange
Open Merriam-Webster's thesaurus entry for remarkable and the first sense listed is "different from the ordinary in a way that causes curiosity or suspicion."
The synonym group under it runs bizarre, strange, odd, peculiar, weird, eccentric, quirky, outlandish, screwy, kooky and freakish.
Every one of those is a legitimate synonym of remarkable — in the sense that means odd. None of them belongs anywhere near a resume.
A job seeker looking for one stronger word lands in that group first, and the list gives no warning that the sense has changed underneath them.
A thesaurus lists candidates, not replacements. Before taking a word from any synonym list, check which sense the list belongs to.
When Remarkable Is Worth Keeping
Sometimes the original word is already the best choice, and reaching for a replacement makes the sentence worse rather than stronger.
Remarkable works when someone else is doing the remarking. "My manager described the turnaround as remarkable" is not a self-assessment.
It is a reported judgment with a source attached, which is exactly what the word was built for. A recommendation letter works the same way.
Keep the word, but move who is saying it. The same adjective that sounded like boasting starts doing real work once it has a named source.
Cover letters raise the same question, because honored, privileged and grateful carry different obligations. Our guide to choosing between honor and its alternatives sorts that group.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does remarkable mean good?
Not by itself. Merriam-Webster defines it as "worthy of being or likely to be noticed especially as being uncommon or extraordinary."
Uncommon is not the same as good. Context supplies the approval, which is why the word turns unreliable on a resume you wrote yourself.
What does "truly remarkable" mean?
Truly is an intensifier, so the phrase means "genuinely worth commenting on." On a resume it adds emphasis where evidence was needed.
That doubles down on the weakest part of the claim, which usually makes the line read as less credible rather than more convincing.
Is remarkable too advanced for a resume written in a second language?
No. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries marks it C1, which is within reach of most professional applicants. The problem is the claim it makes, not its difficulty.
What is the base word for remarkable?
Remark. Oxford Learner's traces the adjective to French remarquer, "take note of," from marquer, "to mark, note."
How This Page Was Checked
Definitions, register labels and the word origin were retrieved from Merriam-Webster, its thesaurus entry and Oxford Learner's Dictionaries on 28 August 2026.
Senses for outstanding and exceptional come from their Merriam-Webster entries, read on the same date and quoted rather than summarised.
The two sources date the word differently. Merriam-Webster gives a first known use of 1593; Oxford Learner's dates the borrowing to the early 17th century.
Both are reported here exactly as published, rather than quietly reconciled into a single date that neither dictionary actually states.
The claim-strength grouping — notice words against rank words — is SynonymQ editorial guidance built from those published definitions.
It is not a label either dictionary applies. No frequency figures, corpus counts or regional claims appear here, because none were retrieved.
Every word-choice guide on SynonymQ is checked the same way: definitions retrieved from published dictionaries and named in the sentence.

Naveed Akhtar writes every guide on SynonymQ. He is an SEO content writer with ten years of article-writing experience, working on the question a thesaurus never answers: which of these words belongs in this sentence, for this reader. Every page cites the dictionary entries it draws on and the date they were read.
